Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Analysis
Home
Analysis
ANALYSIS
Cutting edge analysis on tax issues.
Grandfathering
John Barnett
The Government’s approach to APR and BPR reform combines delay and
anti-forestalling in a way that risks serious unintended consequences,
writes John Barnett (CIOT).
Share reorganisations: new anti-avoidance rules explained
Peter Morley
Jamie Robson
The Autumn Budget 2025 tightens anti-avoidance rules for share
reorganisations. Peter Morley and Jamie Robson (Pinsent Masons) explain
what tax professionals need to be aware of.
Tax and the private capital sector in 2026: three key issues
Elena Rowlands
Ian Zeider
Tom Margesson
Elena Rowlands, Tom Margesson and Ian Zeider (Travers Smith) take stock
of current developments.
Direct and immediate links: the Supreme Court draws the line
Dr Michael Taylor
Dr Michael Taylor (PwC) reviews the Supreme Court’s judgment in
Hotel La Tour
.
That was the year that was 2025
Zoe Andrews
Nadia Hourihan
Zoe Andrews and Nadia Hourihan (Slaughter and May) offer a whirlwind
review of 2025’s tax highlights and curiosities.
Comparing chancellors
Jeremy Mindell
Jeremy Mindell (Primondell) puts the current chancellor in historical context,
showing how past economic inheritances have shaped tax policy.
Tax in 2025: the good, the bad and the ugly
Heather Self
Heather Self (Blick Rothenberg) praises greater HMRC transparency while
warning of deepening fiscal drag and policy inconsistency.
APR/BPR reform: a practitioner’s story
Stuart Maggs
This year has been a roller-coaster, writes Stuart Maggs (Howes Percival).
R&D tax in 2025: the calm after the storm?
Jenny Tragner
Jennifer Tragner (S&W) considers an unsettled year for R&D reliefs, where
transitional rules, evolving guidance and emerging AI questions kept advisers
busy despite few new policy changes.
Should I stay or should I go? Life as a non-dom adviser
Rachel de Souza
Rachel de Souza (RSM UK) charts a tumultuous year for international private
clients, as sweeping changes to domicile, offshore trusts and IHT prompted
unprecedented restructuring – and, for some, departure from the UK.
Go to page
of
453
EDITOR'S PICK
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
,
Craig Kirkham-Wilson
1 /7
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
,
Joe Williams
,
Tom Gardner
2 /7
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
3 /7
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
4 /7
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
5 /7
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
6 /7
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Stephanie Mullins
,
Richard Jeens
7 /7
HMRC powers and the taxpayer relationship: when is enough, enough?
Chris Sanger
,
Constantine Christofi
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
Jill Gatehouse
,
Emily Szasz
Reckless tax statements: a lower threshold for crime?
Adam Craggs
,
Tom Jenkins
Permanent Establishment exemption: preparing for mandatory application
Alison Lobb
,
Lisa Shipley
The 2026 loan charge settlement scheme: the beginning of the end?
David Pett
The new Securities Transfer Tax: business as usual?
Georgina West
Responding to Sch 36 notices: a practical guide
Stephanie Mullins
,
Richard Jeens
NEWS
Read all
Tax receipts rise, but borrowing exceeds OBR forecast ahead of Budget
Construction industry scheme compliance
CIOT urges legislative change on pre-development costs
CIOT backs faster land remediation relief but warns on planning link
Only one in ten highest earners pay top tax rate, says CenTax
CASES
Read all
Environmental Services Ltd v HMRC
Sir J Griffin v HMRC
Minerva Research Labs Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 25 September 2026
J Scheckter v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Substantial
Modernising the taxation of distributions: why now?
TOGCs and leases
Principal or agent?
HMRC get more bang for their buck
MOST READ
Read all
J Scheckter v HMRC
Consultation tracker
Redrawing the line: modernising the taxation of distributions
DOTAS: ‘tax advantage’ and counterfactuals in Hallmark 5
The new taxpayer duty to correct inaccuracies: practical consequences for M&A transactions