Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Williamson Tea: NCAs and goodwill

Jeanette Zaman considers the decision of the First-tier Tribunal that a payment for a non-compete agreement is capable of benefitting from the substantial shareholding exemption

It is somewhat unusual for a taxpayer to rely on an argument before a tribunal that the contractual documentation reflects an artificial device and that its form should therefore be disregarded – it must be even rarer for such an argument to succeed. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal in Williamson Tea Holdings Ltd v HMRC [2010] UKFTT 301 (TC) is interesting as it considers the tax treatment of what was described in a share purchase agreement negotiated between third parties as a payment for a non-competition agreement (NCA) but which the taxpayer argued was a disguised premium for the controlling shareholding of which it was disposing.

Facts in Williamson Tea

The taxpayer WTH agreed to sell its shares in its...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top