Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Will binding arbitration improve cross-border dispute resolution?

Speed read

When the OECD published its final package of measures with regard to its BEPS project, Action 14 was focused on making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective by strengthening the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) and minimising the potential risk of double taxation. The minimum standards proposed by the OECD will be complemented by a set of best practices. Without a mandatory binding arbitration provision, most tax treaties simply provide that the competent authorities must ‘endeavour’ to resolve the position by mutual agreement. However, HMRC has already taken steps to improve dispute resolution by introducing alternative dispute resolution (ADR); and the UK has started updating its double tax treaties with regard to arbitration.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top