In Newey, the Upper Tribunal considered the CJEU’s preliminary ruling in the case and concluded that it said ‘nothing new’. Warren J upheld the FTT’s decision in favour of the taxpayer. A week later, in Pendragon, the Supreme Court pronounced on the nature and application of the abuse principle in VAT cases. Undertaking a careful analysis of Halifax, the court found for HMRC. It seems likely that the decision in Pendragon will encourage HMRC and the tribunals to take a more critical view of VAT planning arrangements and be less easy to persuade of the existence of a commercial motive.
In Newey, the Upper Tribunal considered the CJEU’s preliminary ruling in the case and concluded that it said ‘nothing new’. Warren J upheld the FTT’s decision in favour of the taxpayer. A week later, in Pendragon, the Supreme Court pronounced on the nature and application of the abuse principle in VAT cases. Undertaking a careful analysis of Halifax, the court found for HMRC. It seems likely that the decision in Pendragon will encourage HMRC and the tribunals to take a more critical view of VAT planning arrangements and be less easy to persuade of the existence of a commercial motive.
In Newey, the Upper Tribunal considered the CJEU’s preliminary ruling in the case and concluded that it said ‘nothing new’. Warren J upheld the FTT’s decision in favour of the taxpayer. A week later, in Pendragon, the Supreme Court pronounced on the nature and application of the abuse principle in VAT cases. Undertaking a careful analysis of Halifax, the court found for HMRC. It seems likely that the decision in Pendragon will encourage HMRC and the tribunals to take a more critical view of VAT planning arrangements and be less easy to persuade of the existence of a commercial motive.