VAT developments that matter this month are: ECJ confirmed that assignment of debts at a discount is not a taxable supply of debt collection by the assignee in GFKL Financial Services; in Sauer-Danfoss, the ECJ held that customers who have borne indirect tax in breach of EU law may recover that tax directly from the tax authority where they are unable to recover it from the supplier; and, in Grattan, the Upper Tribunal allowed a reference to the ECJ on whether (if there is an EU law right to compound interest) taxpayers should be entitled to claim overpaid VAT and compound interest in one set of proceedings.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
VAT developments that matter this month are: ECJ confirmed that assignment of debts at a discount is not a taxable supply of debt collection by the assignee in GFKL Financial Services; in Sauer-Danfoss, the ECJ held that customers who have borne indirect tax in breach of EU law may recover that tax directly from the tax authority where they are unable to recover it from the supplier; and, in Grattan, the Upper Tribunal allowed a reference to the ECJ on whether (if there is an EU law right to compound interest) taxpayers should be entitled to claim overpaid VAT and compound interest in one set of proceedings.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: