Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

UBS and DB: a further victory for purposive legal interpretation

Speed read

In UBS AG v HMRC and DB Group Services v HMRC, the Supreme Court applied a purposive Ramsay approach when considering the treatment of composite transactions which were designed to avoid the payment of income tax and NICs on bankers’ bonuses. The the court did not accept HMRC’s wider view that the employees had effectively received cash; however, it did accept the ‘narrower Ramsay argument’ and ruled that the individuals were treated as receiving unrestricted securities. This decision means that many of the most popular means of avoiding tax in this field can no longer be guaranteed to be effective.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top