Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

The VAT review for May 2020

Speed read
In Zipvit Ltd, the Supreme Court has referred to the CJEU questions concerning the availability of input VAT recovery where a supply was historically incorrectly treated as exempt. In NHS Lothian Health Board, the Court of Session has suggested that the tribunals have taken an overly strict approach to the evidence required to support historical claims for input VAT recovery going back as far as 1973. The correct contractual analysis of arrangements and its importance for the VAT analysis is again a feature of the Virgin Media case on prompt payment discounts. Finally, the government has announced a number of indirect tax measures in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic.

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top