Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Substantia Invest v HMRC

In Substantia Invest v HMRC [2015] UKFTT 671 (14 December 2015) the FTT found that input tax incurred by a property investment company on legal fees for the defense of its sole director was not deductible.

The appeal related to input tax incurred on legal services for the defence of Substantia’s owner and sole director against criminal charges of false accounting. HMRC had rejected the repayment claim on the grounds that Substantia was not carrying on a taxable business and that there was no direct and immediate link between the reclaimed input tax and supplies made by it.

Referring (inter alia) to Becker [2013] EUECJ (C-104/12) the FTT observed that for input tax to be recoverable the goods or services must not simply benefit the business but must be used for the purpose of the business; a ‘direct and immediate link’ was required.

The FTT...

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top