Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Stoke and the sporting services VAT exemption

Speed read

On 17 October 2018, the Upper Tribunal released its decision in HMRC v Stoke by Nayland Golf and Leisure and dismissed HMRC’s appeal. This decision is the first time that HMRC has lost a case involving the sporting services VAT exemption and whether a supplier of sporting services is subject to commercial influence. The decision covers a number of distinct issues that have significant ramifications both for taxpayers who are seeking to pursue an Edwards v Bairstow challenge to a decision of the fact finding tribunal and for those seeking to apply the sporting exemption.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top