Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Starbucks and Starbucks Manufacturing EMEA v Commission

In Starbucks and Starbucks Manufacturing EMEA v Commission (Case T-636/16) (24 September 2019) the General Court of the European Union found that the commission had not established that a transfer pricing arrangement constituted state aid.

In 2008 the Netherlands tax authorities concluded an advance pricing arrangement (APA) with Starbucks Manufacturing EMEA BV (SMBV) part of the Starbucks group which inter alia roasts coffees. The objective of that arrangement was to determine SMBV’s remuneration for its production and distribution activities within the group. Thereafter SMBV’s remuneration served to determine annually its taxable profit on the basis of the Netherlands corporate income tax.

In addition the APA endorsed the amount of the royalty paid by SMBV to Alki another entity of the same group for the use of Starbucks’ roasting intellectual property. The APA provided that the amount of the royalty to be...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top