Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

SC Terracult v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara

In SC Terracult v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara (Case C-835/18) (26 March 2020) the advocate general (AG) considered that a member state was precluded from a practice which did not allow the correction of invoices in respect of transactions which were the subject of a tax inspection and assessment where additional information subsequently came to light. 

The appellant (D) supplied goods to a German customer (A) from Romania on the basis that the transactions were intra-Community movements of goods. Thus the supplies were exempted (i.e. zero-rated in UK parlance).  Following a tax inspection D was unable to provide evidence that the goods had left Romania and the authorities raised an assessment for the VAT due on the supplies which D paid without demur. 

It subsequently transpired that the goods had indeed not left Romania but that under the rules in place at the time A was required to account for VAT on the supplies under the reverse charge procedure. D therefore issued correcting...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top