Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Samuel and Helen Moore (t/a Moore Farms) v HMRC

In Samuel and Helen Moore (t/a Moore Farms) v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 411 (TC) (7 September) the FTT decided in favour of HMRC denying a late appeal despite accepting that the taxpayer had a strong case in law. Publication of a new authority prompted the late appeal but this was held as insufficient reason for not making a timely appeal.

HMRC unilaterally cancelled Moore Farms’ agricultural flat rate scheme (AFRS) certificate in July 2013. At the time Moore Farms was of the opinion that a challenge to HMRC’s position was unlikely to succeed. HMRC considered that it had authority to exclude taxpayers from AFRS. 

Late in 2017 the CJEU in Shields & Sons Partnership v HMRC (Case C-262/16) decided that HMRC had been incorrect as a matter of law in cancelling Shields’ AFRS certificate. Moore Farms had therefore incorrectly been excluded from the AFRS. It estimated that...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top