The decision in Samarkand serves as a timely reminder to taxpayers of the extent to which they can rely on HMRC’s manuals. The decision highlights that no matter how clear or unqualified a statement in HMRC’s manuals might appear to be, it will be open for HMRC to depart from that guidance if it considers that tax avoidance is or may be involved, leaving the taxpayer in question with an uphill struggle to prove that it has a substantive legitimate expectation that should be protected.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The decision in Samarkand serves as a timely reminder to taxpayers of the extent to which they can rely on HMRC’s manuals. The decision highlights that no matter how clear or unqualified a statement in HMRC’s manuals might appear to be, it will be open for HMRC to depart from that guidance if it considers that tax avoidance is or may be involved, leaving the taxpayer in question with an uphill struggle to prove that it has a substantive legitimate expectation that should be protected.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: