In S Lamb v RCPO (CA – 18 March), an individual (P) was convicted of two counts of cheating the public revenue in relation to a VAT MTIC fraud.
VAT: MTIC fraud
In S Lamb v RCPO (CA – 18 March) an individual (P) was convicted of two counts of cheating the public revenue in relation to a VAT MTIC fraud.
He was sentenced to eight years' imprisonment. The court also made a confiscation order requiring him to pay more than £1 400 000. The court also granted the RCPO a receivership order in respect of a property in London which P had occupied and used for the purposes of the fraud.
Another individual (L) lodged an appeal to the CA contending that he was the legal and beneficial owner of the property in question and that the order relating to the property should be...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In S Lamb v RCPO (CA – 18 March), an individual (P) was convicted of two counts of cheating the public revenue in relation to a VAT MTIC fraud.
VAT: MTIC fraud
In S Lamb v RCPO (CA – 18 March) an individual (P) was convicted of two counts of cheating the public revenue in relation to a VAT MTIC fraud.
He was sentenced to eight years' imprisonment. The court also made a confiscation order requiring him to pay more than £1 400 000. The court also granted the RCPO a receivership order in respect of a property in London which P had occupied and used for the purposes of the fraud.
Another individual (L) lodged an appeal to the CA contending that he was the legal and beneficial owner of the property in question and that the order relating to the property should be...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
