Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Reed Employment plc v HMRC (and related appeals) (No 4)

In Reed Employment plc v HMRC (and related appeals) (No 4) (TC01727 – 19 January) several associated companies carried on businesses as employment bureaux. They paid allowances to employees to cover travelling expenses. In 1998 a Revenue officer granted a dispensation under which the companies were not required to account for PAYE and NICs. HMRC subsequently formed the opinion that the dispensation should have not been granted and in 2006 it revoked it. The companies continued to pay the allowances without accounting for PAYE and in 2007 HMRC issued determinations under Income Tax (PAYE) Regulations SI 2003/2682 reg 80. The companies appealed. The First-tier Tribunal reviewed the evidence in detail and dismissed the appeals holding that the allowances were payments of earnings intended to reimburse ordinary commuting expenses and that the companies should have accounted for tax throughout the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top