Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Reader feedback: The meaning of ‘business’ for CGT and IHT purposes

Dear sir

In commenting upon two recent decisions of the Upper Tribunal (‘What is a business?’) Peter Vaines draws the conclusion that a tension has been created between the meaning of ‘business’ for the purposes of CGT and for IHT.

In Ramsay v HMRC [2013] UKUT 0226 (TCC) the Upper Tribunal held that letting flats was a business for the purposes of TCGA 1992 s 162 (transfer of a business to a company) the FTT having held that it was not. In The Zetland Settlement v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 284 (TC) the Upper Tribunal held that the letting of an office building did not attract BPR. There is in fact no conflict here: the question for BPR purposes was not whether the letting was a business but whether the business consisted ‘wholly or mainly’ of making investments. Thus it was the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top