Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

R (oao Company of Proprietors of Whitchurch Bridge)

The Whitchurch Bridge Act 1792 established a company (W) to build and maintain a toll bridge over the River Thames. It was accepted that the tolls which W charged were exempt from VAT. In R (oao Company of Proprietors of Whitchurch Bridge) (QB – 13 December) W applied to the Treasury to be included as a ‘specified body’ under VATA 1994 s 33(3)(k) so that it could claim refunds of VAT. The Treasury rejected the application and W applied for judicial review. The QB rejected this application. Burnett J held that the Treasury had been entitled to decide that bodies which had no power to levy local taxation should not be specified under s 33(3)(k).

Why it matters: The QB accepted the Treasury’s contention that it was not obliged to treat the applicant as a specified body within VATA...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top