Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Private client briefing for August 2018

Speed read

In Lam, the FTT agrees with HMRC that main residence relief is not available for a taxpayer due to insufficient evidence. In Oxbotica Ltd, the FTT rejects HMRC’s argument that there must be a ‘meaningful level of investment’ for a SEIS claim. In Locke, the High Court dismisses a judicial review claim in respect of follower notices and accelerated payment notices issued by HMRC to a taxpayer. In Tager & Anor, the Court of Appeal reviews a UT decision to impose tax-related penalties for failure to provide information.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.