Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Private client briefing for August 2018

Speed read

In Lam, the FTT agrees with HMRC that main residence relief is not available for a taxpayer due to insufficient evidence. In Oxbotica Ltd, the FTT rejects HMRC’s argument that there must be a ‘meaningful level of investment’ for a SEIS claim. In Locke, the High Court dismisses a judicial review claim in respect of follower notices and accelerated payment notices issued by HMRC to a taxpayer. In Tager & Anor, the Court of Appeal reviews a UT decision to impose tax-related penalties for failure to provide information.

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top