Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Pimlico Plumbers and another v Smith

In Pimlico Plumbers and another v Smith [2018] UKSC 29 (13 June 2018) the Supreme Court held that although Mr Smith was not an employee he was a worker. This gave him some protection for the purposes of employment legislation but he was self-employed for tax purposes.

From 2005 to 2011 Mr Smith a plumbing and heating engineer had worked for Pimlico a substantial plumbing business. Mr Smith had issued proceedings against Pimlico alleging that he was an employee under a contract of service within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996 s 230(1) and that he had been dismissed unfairly. He also contended that he had been a worker within the meaning of s 230(3).

The court first observed that ‘it is conceptually legitimate as well as convenient’ to treat the three decisions of the lower courts in this case...

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top