Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Ms M Woods v HMRC

In Ms M Woods v HMRC (TC01505 – 10 November) a woman (W) submitted returns claiming rent-a-room relief under ITTOIA 2005 s 784 et seq. HMRC issued assessments and imposed penalties under TMA 1970 s 95 on the basis that the income did not qualify for relief. W appealed. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the appeal finding that the property concerned was not W’s only or main residence as required by ITTOIA 2005 s 786(1).

Why it matters: ITTOIA 2005 s 786(1) provides that ‘rent-a-room’ relief is only due if ‘for some or all of that period the residence is the individual’s only or main residence’. The First-tier Tribunal upheld HMRC’s view that that condition was not satisfied in this case.

If you or your firm subscribes to, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or '' for further assistance.