Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Mrs SA Searle v HMRC

In Mrs SA Searle v HMRC (TC01521 – 21 November) a woman (S) bought a plot of land adjacent to her existing house. She wanted to build two semi-detached houses (one for each of her daughters) but the local council refused planning permission for this. The council subsequently agreed to grant planning permission for the construction of a bungalow ‘to provide two residential units for two related families’ subject to a covenant that the bungalow would only be occupied by S and her family. The planning permission showed an internal door between the units but the doorway was subsequently blocked up and plastered over.
S claimed a refund of VAT under VATA 1994 s 35. HMRC rejected the claim on the grounds that the work failed to meet the requirements of VATA 1994 Sch 8 Group 5 Note 2....

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top