M Bamberg v HMRC illustrates some interesting points regarding the transactions in securities legislation. The Tribunal judge decided not to interpret the provisions widely, and held HMRC to
be wrong in its long-held interpretation of the ‘foreign law clause’. The judge also decided that the transfer of a trade to a company with negative reserves could not be counteracted. It also seems likely that the results would have been the same under the new rules applicable to income tax.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
M Bamberg v HMRC illustrates some interesting points regarding the transactions in securities legislation. The Tribunal judge decided not to interpret the provisions widely, and held HMRC to
be wrong in its long-held interpretation of the ‘foreign law clause’. The judge also decided that the transfer of a trade to a company with negative reserves could not be counteracted. It also seems likely that the results would have been the same under the new rules applicable to income tax.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: