The Excise Goods (Holding, Movement and Duty Point) Regulations, SI 2010/593, (the HMDP regulations) have been in force for several years, but there have been few decisions regarding when an ‘irregularity’ and consequent duty point arises. The recent First-tier Tribunal decision of Logfret (UK) Ltd v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 484 (TC) considered a successful appeal against assessments raised on the basis that there were deemed irregularities, and has provided some welcome clarification regarding the application and scope of the HMDP regulations.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The Excise Goods (Holding, Movement and Duty Point) Regulations, SI 2010/593, (the HMDP regulations) have been in force for several years, but there have been few decisions regarding when an ‘irregularity’ and consequent duty point arises. The recent First-tier Tribunal decision of Logfret (UK) Ltd v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 484 (TC) considered a successful appeal against assessments raised on the basis that there were deemed irregularities, and has provided some welcome clarification regarding the application and scope of the HMDP regulations.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: