The local implementation of the EU’s ‘DAC 6’ Directive by EU member states differs in several key aspects, including: the operation of legal and professional privilege; the application of the tax main benefit test; inclusion of domestic transactions and additional taxes in scope; and the level and type of penalties awarded. These differences are compounded by differing interpretations of the basic DAC 6 provisions between member states. Taxpayers and intermediaries alike therefore need to be aware of how these differences will practically impact the disclosure report and how they meet their DAC 6 reporting requirements.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The local implementation of the EU’s ‘DAC 6’ Directive by EU member states differs in several key aspects, including: the operation of legal and professional privilege; the application of the tax main benefit test; inclusion of domestic transactions and additional taxes in scope; and the level and type of penalties awarded. These differences are compounded by differing interpretations of the basic DAC 6 provisions between member states. Taxpayers and intermediaries alike therefore need to be aware of how these differences will practically impact the disclosure report and how they meet their DAC 6 reporting requirements.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
90a1d87b-c1b5-43c3-a720-cd324830adee.tmb-editorspic.jpg?sfvrsn=1b2d0a7e_1)
