The respective Heads of the judiciary and Senior President of Tribunals have issued updated guidance for ‘all judicial office holders’ under their responsibility on the use of artificial intelligence covering key risks and issues associated with AI. For example one key limitation is public AI chatbots’ inability to provide answers from authoritative databases potentially leading to misleading answers. The guidance also reaffirms the principle that judicial office holders are personally responsible for material produced in their name.
The guidance reminds judges that AI tools may have been used in the preparation of a case or indeed as a main source of advice by the unrepresented.
The guidance also notes the introduction of Microsoft’s AI-powered chatbot Copilot Chat for judges.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The respective Heads of the judiciary and Senior President of Tribunals have issued updated guidance for ‘all judicial office holders’ under their responsibility on the use of artificial intelligence covering key risks and issues associated with AI. For example one key limitation is public AI chatbots’ inability to provide answers from authoritative databases potentially leading to misleading answers. The guidance also reaffirms the principle that judicial office holders are personally responsible for material produced in their name.
The guidance reminds judges that AI tools may have been used in the preparation of a case or indeed as a main source of advice by the unrepresented.
The guidance also notes the introduction of Microsoft’s AI-powered chatbot Copilot Chat for judges.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
