In HMRC v M and E McQuillan [2017] UKUT 344 (6 September 2017) the UT found that redeemable shares were part of the ordinary share capital of a company so that it was not the personal company of its two directors (TCGA 1992 s 169I(6).
Mr and Mrs McQuillan had set up a company to run a sandwich shop business. They each held shares in the company together with two family members who also jointly made a £30 000 loan to the company. When the McQuillans approached a business development agency for a grant they were asked to convert the loan into redeemable shares. As a result the issued share capital of the company comprised 100 voting shares (of which the McQuillans held 66) and 30 000 non-voting redeemable shares held by the two family members.
Later on Mr and Mrs McQuillan claimed entrepreneurs’...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In HMRC v M and E McQuillan [2017] UKUT 344 (6 September 2017) the UT found that redeemable shares were part of the ordinary share capital of a company so that it was not the personal company of its two directors (TCGA 1992 s 169I(6).
Mr and Mrs McQuillan had set up a company to run a sandwich shop business. They each held shares in the company together with two family members who also jointly made a £30 000 loan to the company. When the McQuillans approached a business development agency for a grant they were asked to convert the loan into redeemable shares. As a result the issued share capital of the company comprised 100 voting shares (of which the McQuillans held 66) and 30 000 non-voting redeemable shares held by the two family members.
Later on Mr and Mrs McQuillan claimed entrepreneurs’...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: