HMRC v Hicks clarifies the standard of work that the Upper Tribunal expects an agent to produce in order to escape being considered careless such that HMRC can use extended time limits to issue discovery assessments. It also refocuses attention on the quality and adequacy of a taxpayer’s disclosure in order to prevent discovery assessments being issued under TMA 1970 s 29(5) in the absence of culpable behaviour and enquiries. Consequently, it provides a useful refresher of the steps agents may take, in conjunction with clients, in order to reduce the possibility of HMRC successfully making a discovery.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
HMRC v Hicks clarifies the standard of work that the Upper Tribunal expects an agent to produce in order to escape being considered careless such that HMRC can use extended time limits to issue discovery assessments. It also refocuses attention on the quality and adequacy of a taxpayer’s disclosure in order to prevent discovery assessments being issued under TMA 1970 s 29(5) in the absence of culpable behaviour and enquiries. Consequently, it provides a useful refresher of the steps agents may take, in conjunction with clients, in order to reduce the possibility of HMRC successfully making a discovery.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
90a1d87b-c1b5-43c3-a720-cd324830adee.tmb-editorspic.jpg?sfvrsn=1b2d0a7e_1)
