Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Hannah and another v HMRC

In D Hannah and another v HMRC [2021] UKUT 22 (TCC) (2 February 2021) the Upper Tribunal (UT) agreed with the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) and held that the effective date of a transaction was the date that cash consideration was paid (not the date an annuity was granted) and that the consideration was £765 000 (being the deposit paid on exchange of contracts and a cash amount paid on completion). The UT also held that the discovery assessment was valid and it upheld the penalty for deliberate inaccuracy.

The appellants entered into a contact to buy a residential property for a purchase price of £765 000. They paid a 10% cash deposit. The contract provided that the appellants could satisfy their obligation to pay the purchase price by issuing an annuity to the sellers. The appellants issued an annuity to the sellers and it was redeemed and released before...

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top