Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Gripple and the purposive approach

Speed read

Gripple Ltd v HMRC considered the application of the rule in Barclays Mercantile v Mawson to a case that involved no element of tax avoidance. In the writer’s view, Parliament would clearly have intended this company to qualify for R&D relief, but the claim failed on a strict reading of FA 2000 Sch 20. The Judge was not willing to interpret the legislation ‘generously’ to allow the relief and his judgment made it clear that a ‘detailed and prescriptive’ tax code does not lend itself to a purposive approach. Will this come back to haunt HMRC in avoidance cases?

If you or your firm subscribes to, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or '' for further assistance.