Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Graffiti Busters Ltd v HMRC

In Graffiti Busters Ltd v HMRC (TC03201 – 10 January 2014) Graffiti Busters (GB) had been imposed a default surcharge for late payment of VAT. GB had also paid HMRC in error under the CIS and these monies had not been refunded.

Interestingly GB did not make a claim for restitution nor did it claim the equitable right of set-off. Instead it simply argued that the fact that HMRC held an equivalent amount of money without any statutory basis constituted a reasonable excuse for the late payment of VAT.

The tribunal agreed with the company and found that it had a reasonable excuse in relation to the monies already held by HMRC.

GB also contended that it fell within the Steptoe exception ([1992] STC 757). The case is authority for the proposition that the cause of insufficiency of funds may be a reasonable excuse –...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top