Goldenstate v HMRC

Cathya Djanogly

In Goldenstate v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 568 (18 July 2017) the FTT refused to amend grounds of appeal and confirmed that it does not have jurisdiction to consider the validity of an APN.

Goldenstate had implemented a scheme and HMRC had issued an APN under FA 2014 s 219(4)(b) and then a penalty for late payment of the APN.

Goldenstate appealed against the penalty. Having first claimed reasonable excuse the company applied to amend its ground of appeal in order to challenge the validity of the APN. It contended that HMRC’s enquiry into its return had been out of time so that there had been no open enquiry and condition A in s 219(2)(a) had not been satisfied.

The FTT refused the application to amend the grounds of appeal noting that there was no good reason for the lateness of Goldenstate’s application. The FTT added...

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.

If you are already a subscriber, sign in

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.

Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.