After the excitement surrounding the OECD’s pillar one consultation, some might view the pillar two consultation as something of an anti-climax. Unlike pillar one, the launch was not heralded by a fanfare of announcements and webcasts but was quietly released on 8 November. However, one should not underestimate the significance of this document which could have a fundamental impact on the way all multinationals are taxed, including the possible introduction of a global minimum rate of tax. The issues raised involve huge politico-economic questions for the 135 members of the Inclusive Framework. However, those looking for answers and a clear mapping of the road ahead may, for the moment, be disappointed.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
After the excitement surrounding the OECD’s pillar one consultation, some might view the pillar two consultation as something of an anti-climax. Unlike pillar one, the launch was not heralded by a fanfare of announcements and webcasts but was quietly released on 8 November. However, one should not underestimate the significance of this document which could have a fundamental impact on the way all multinationals are taxed, including the possible introduction of a global minimum rate of tax. The issues raised involve huge politico-economic questions for the 135 members of the Inclusive Framework. However, those looking for answers and a clear mapping of the road ahead may, for the moment, be disappointed.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
46e37824-a968-47e3-9df6-5cabde126ca3.jpg?sfvrsn=96a277a5_1)
.tmb-editorspic.jpg?sfvrsn=df04ab27_1)
