Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Dishonesty and the failure to prevent evasion

Speed read

In Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd, the Supreme Court overturned 25 years of precedent of what it is to be dishonest. A failure to appreciate that what was done was dishonest is no longer a defence. As businesses are implementing measures to prevent tax evasion, the scope of what it is to evade taxes has just been expanded significantly.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top