Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Dishonesty and the failure to prevent evasion

Speed read

In Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd, the Supreme Court overturned 25 years of precedent of what it is to be dishonest. A failure to appreciate that what was done was dishonest is no longer a defence. As businesses are implementing measures to prevent tax evasion, the scope of what it is to evade taxes has just been expanded significantly.

If you or your firm subscribes to, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or '' for further assistance.