Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Disguised Interest & Purposive Drafting

 
Roger Muray Ernst & Young LLP welcomes the principles-based drafting approach in the draft provisions dealing with 'Financial Products Avoidance' but asks whether the current drafts meet with that ideal
 
In December HMRC issued a consultation document that included two new anti-avoidance provisions drafted using a purposive or 'principles-based' approach. The new clauses were designed to replace much longer prescriptively drafted legislation dealing with 'disguised interest' and 'transfers of income streams'. The idea was that the drafting approach would halt the game of cat and mouse where tax planners found ways round anti-abuse rules leading to sticking-plaster amendments which inexorably lengthened and complicated the Tax Acts. In her article in The Tax Journal 'Income in Disguise' 1 Sarah Luder outlined the proposals. In this article I will:
 

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top