Speed Read: The following conclusions can be drawn from the recent Supreme Court case Grays Timber Products Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] UKSC 4: Share rights that are purely personal to a shareholder will not affect the market value of shares for ITEPA 2003 Pt 7 Ch 3D. The questions of whether share rights in a shareholders' agreement which automatically benefit a purchaser are to be treated separately from the underlying shares when assessing the Chapter 3D market value and, if so, whether such rights are themselves separate employment-related securities, are still open. To avoid any Chapter 3D issues, the safest course is still to draft share rights as class rights in the articles.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Speed Read: The following conclusions can be drawn from the recent Supreme Court case Grays Timber Products Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] UKSC 4: Share rights that are purely personal to a shareholder will not affect the market value of shares for ITEPA 2003 Pt 7 Ch 3D. The questions of whether share rights in a shareholders' agreement which automatically benefit a purchaser are to be treated separately from the underlying shares when assessing the Chapter 3D market value and, if so, whether such rights are themselves separate employment-related securities, are still open. To avoid any Chapter 3D issues, the safest course is still to draft share rights as class rights in the articles.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: