Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

C Runham & Ms C Naramore v HMRC

In C Runham & Ms C Naramore v HMRC (TC00933 – 1 February) a couple purchased a property in March 2010. Their solicitors sent the form SDLT1 and appropriate cheque to HMRC. On 30 April one of the solicitors contacted HMRC because she had not received a certificate of payment (SDLT5). HMRC responded that they had not received the SDLT1 or cheque. The solicitor cancelled the original cheque submitted a new SDLT1 electronically and paid the duty by electronic transfer. HMRC imposed a penalty but the First-Tier Tribunal allowed the couple’s appeal. Judge Tildesley accepted the couple’s evidence and held that despite the statement in HMRC’s Stamp Duty Land Tax Manual SDLTM 86460 the fact that a return had been delayed or lost in the post could constitute a reasonable excuse. He observed that the solicitor ‘had established a process which involved a prompt on her...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top