The recent decision of the First-tier Tribunal in BlueCrest Capital Management Cayman Ltd covers some fundamental questions of UK tax including the treatment of tiered partnerships, the deductibility of loans to non-resident partners and the taxation of partnership distributions. The answers reached by the tribunal, if upheld, are likely to have implications for other taxpayers, particularly non-resident companies that are members of UK trading partnerships and individual partners that may have entered into remuneration planning arrangements. The decision is also notable for finding that a thinly capitalised SPV will not necessarily have its profits adjusted under transfer pricing rules.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The recent decision of the First-tier Tribunal in BlueCrest Capital Management Cayman Ltd covers some fundamental questions of UK tax including the treatment of tiered partnerships, the deductibility of loans to non-resident partners and the taxation of partnership distributions. The answers reached by the tribunal, if upheld, are likely to have implications for other taxpayers, particularly non-resident companies that are members of UK trading partnerships and individual partners that may have entered into remuneration planning arrangements. The decision is also notable for finding that a thinly capitalised SPV will not necessarily have its profits adjusted under transfer pricing rules.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
90a1d87b-c1b5-43c3-a720-cd324830adee.tmb-editorspic.jpg?sfvrsn=1b2d0a7e_1)
