Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Belgische Staat v Wereldhave Belgium Comm. VA and others

In Belgische Staat v Wereldhave Belgium Comm. VA and others (Case C-448/15) (8 March 2017) the CJEU found that Directive 90/435 (the parent-subsidiary directive) does not apply in circumstances where the recipient is subject to a zero rate of corporation tax.

Wereldhave Belgium (a limited partnership with a share capital) was owned by Wereldhave International and Wereldhave both Dutch public limited companies. Wereldhave Belgium had paid to Wereldhave International and Wereldhave dividends totalling over €20m. Both parent companies contended that no withholding tax was due on the dividends under the parent-subsidiary directive. The Belgian tax authorities considered that the recipients of the dividends were Netherlands fiscal investment institutions (FIIs) subject to corporation tax at a nil rate; and were therefore not eligible for the exemption.

The CJEU noted that the directive seeks to ensure the tax neutrality of the distribution of profits by a subsidiary established in one...

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content.
If you are already a subscriber, sign in
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.